Online Now 2322

The CheckerBoard

The place for inside information on the Tennessee Vols

On this Board 867
Record: 4783 (12/9/2012)

Online now 1999
Record: 6475 (12/7/2012)

Reply

168....

  • I do like and think we need to clarify no huddle vs hurry up. We have been running, or trying to run, some hurry up. No huddle is fine, as stated, for the reason of not allowing subs but for the love of Jay Graham can we just pound the rock?! We are more than capable.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CheckerboardVol

  • CheckerboardVol said...

    I do like and think we need to clarify no huddle vs hurry up. We have been running, or trying to run, some hurry up. No huddle is fine, as stated, for the reason of not allowing subs but for the love of Jay Graham can we just pound the rock?! We are more than capable.

    +1. With Cutcliffe, we had high octane offenses, that were built about pounding the rock, again, and again, and again. It wears out the opponent, mentally and physically, invigorates the offensive line and backs, and opens up play action, or as I like to call it, "Tennessee Football."

    And no, I'm not in favor of bringing back Cutcliffe.

    5. Ball, oskie, cover, block, cut and slice, pursue and gang tackle... for this is the WINNING EDGE.

    utoskie208064

  • This post is for members of GoVols247 or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    Staff writer for govols247 — http://www.twitter.com/RyanCallahan247 — rcallahan@247sports.com

    Ryan Callahan

  • This post is for members of GoVols247 or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    CheckerboardVol