-
volfan28 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
2815 votes total - Two-deep
- (4141)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GoOrangeVFL ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
597 votes total - Walk-on
- (714)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Voldog69
- 5 stars Rating: 90
396 votes total - Walk-on
- (502)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Kfrey18 said...
I heard "someone will call...," but it is impossible to know for sure from the audio.
In the context of the sentence "so" would not make any sense. To illustrate this point, insert the definition of the conjunction "so" into the sentence: To say "my role won't change at all 'and for this reason' I will call the defenses" is nonsense. If he was trying to communicate that he is making the calls, he would have simply said "my role won't change at all; I will call the defenses."
It is far more likely that he anticipated this question and came prepared to give a mumbled ambiguous answer. I am a lawyer (in the northeast no less) and see people do that crap all the time. If he had been asked "are you doing the calls," he couldn't have wiggled out of a direct answer, but the wording of the question allowed him to skirt the issue. His meaningless follow up comment of "and that will get us going" further illustrates his intent to avoid the issue as best he could.
tnbear66 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
2804 votes total - Two-deep
- (5516)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Voldog69 said...
How does "So I'm gonna call the defenses" not make sense? He literally says, "My role won't change it all." Then goes on to say the sentence on trial here. It makes sense....
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by volfan28 on 11/9/2012 at 8:49 AM
volfan28 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
2815 votes total - Two-deep
- (4141)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Kfrey18 said...
In the context of the sentence "so" would not make any sense. To illustrate this point, insert the definition of the conjunction "so" into the sentence: To say "my role won't change at all 'and for this reason' I will call the defenses" is nonsense. If he was trying to communicate that he is making the calls, he would have simply said "my role won't change at all; I will call the defenses."
It is far more likely that he anticipated this question and came prepared to give a mumbled ambiguous answer. I am a lawyer (in the northeast no less) and see people do that crap all the time. If he had been asked "are you doing the calls," he couldn't have wiggled out of a direct answer, but the wording of the question allowed him to skirt the issue. His meaningless follow up comment of "and that will get us going" further illustrates his intent to avoid the issue as best he could.
volfan28 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
2815 votes total - Two-deep
- (4141)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
volfan28 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
2815 votes total - Two-deep
- (4141)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BigHodgie ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
343 votes total - Walk-on
- (875)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Joe Roberts ●
- 5 stars Rating: 100
26 votes total - Recruit
- (36)
- 9 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GoVols664 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
41 votes total - Recruit
- (78)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Refresh








Confusion over a Sal Sunseri quote...