Online Now 603

The CheckerBoard

The place for inside information on the Tennessee Vols

On this Board 300
Record: 4783 (12/9/2012)

Online now 612
Record: 6475 (12/7/2012)

Reply

SEC Solidarity Makes No Sense

  • hdrizzle21 said...

    Marcus Ball is the potential to be one of them.

    No he doesn't. Marcus Ball's only SEC offers are from us and Kentucky. If he had an Alabama offer, wouldn't he just take that if he only wants to play in the SEC?

    Also, more to the point, how is SEC dominance really helping us if your only example is a 3* guy with no other meaningful SEC offers? Is that the recruiting synergy that we are bestowed with because everyone else in the league is winning like crazy? If so, I'd prefer for them to lose some games in hopes that we could more successfully go toe to toe with them for all of the elite guys they keep getting.

    I should rephrase:

    Show me an elite recruit with offers from SEC powers that choose to come here because the SEC wins a lot of games and championships. That's essentially what the logic of SEC solidarity is getting at.

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • volfan28 said...

    It might hurt us with someone like Derrick Green, who is down to Tennessee and Michigan, but I think Bama losing is the lesser of the two evils.

    Why would Derrick Green think less of UT or more of UM if Notre Dame defeats Alabama?

    I don't see the connection.

    This post was edited by Denver Vol on 12/20/2012 at 2:14 PM

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • smasher423 said...

    Our goal is to get back to the top of the SEC. No offense to Marcus Ball, but a team full of Marcus Ball's is not going to help UT overtake Bama. The recruits that will help us get back to the top are the ones that Bama is also recruiting. When they are winning national championships at this rate, what do we sell to those guys?

    Well as long as Nick Saban is at Bama they will have top 5 classes. Nothing we can do about it. They will always be good...

    The key IMO is to move our focus to the Carolinas, and the DC/Virginia area. Build relationships there where there aren't dominant teams.

    hdrizzle21

  • Denver Vol said...

    Why would Derrick Green think less of UT or more of UM if Notre Dame defeats Alabama?

    I don't see the connection.

    The SEC pitch won't be as strong.

    volfan28

  • volfan28 said...

    The SEC pitch won't be as strong.

    BINGO!

    hdrizzle21

  • hdrizzle21 said...

    BINGO!

    BUT

    I don't think that hurts us as much as Bama getting whoever they want, if our goal is to ultimately sit atop the SEC.

    volfan28

  • volfan28 said...

    BUT

    I don't think that hurts us as much as Bama getting whoever they want, if our goal is to ultimately sit atop the SEC.

    I think that's just Nick Saban. As long as he's there they will be good. He's a once in a generation type coach. Best college football coach since I've been alive.

    hdrizzle21

  • volfan28 said...

    BUT

    I don't think that hurts us as much as Bama getting whoever they want, if our goal is to ultimately sit atop the SEC.

    Correct. Maybe that aspect of Green's recruitment is slightly diminished, but it would still be sold as the best conference. Bama losing to a team without a conference doesn't really change that overall perception. Bama losing to Notre Dame isn't going to make Green think the Big-10 is suddenly a better conference, if he's logical at all.

    Moreover, like you said, we go head to head with Bama and other SEC teams WAY more often than we do with Michigan. If Bama losing lost Green but opened the door with a number of other recruits, that's a good trade-off for UT.

    That said, I don't think Bama losing would make Green swing to Michigan. There are likely a lot of other, more substantial factors that go into his decision than conference strength.

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • hdrizzle21 said...

    I think that's just Nick Saban. As long as he's there they will be good. He's a once in a generation type coach. Best college football coach since I've been alive.

    They'll always be good, yes, but why would we cheer for them to win championships.

    On top of the fact that it probably doesn't help us, they're the enemy!

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • The only reason I root for other SEC teams is because those are the teams with which I am most familiar and fond. So long as they aren't playing UT, I will generally root for them, but not because of the conference affiliation itself. Alabama and Florida, however, can go screw themselves. Unfortunately, I hate Notre Dame like Rucker hates the Cardinals. I'm going to be bummed no matter who wins the NC game.

    Regarding the argument that we shouldn't root for an SEC team because they are recruiting rivals, that logic only takes you so far. Without dominance and solid recruiting by a majority of the league, the quality of the league as a whole goes down.

    jonasjrr

  • Denver Vol said...

    Correct. Maybe that aspect of Green's recruitment is slightly diminished, but it would still be sold as the best conference. Bama losing to a team without a conference doesn't really change that overall perception. Bama losing to Notre Dame isn't going to make Green think the Big-10 is suddenly a better conference, if he's logical at all.

    Moreover, like you said, we go head to head with Bama and other SEC teams WAY more often than we do with Michigan. If Bama losing lost Green but opened the door with a number of other recruits, that's a good trade-off for UT.

    That said, I don't think Bama losing would make Green swing to Michigan. There are likely a lot of other, more substantial factors that go into his decision than conference strength.

    I would say if Bama loses, there is a better chance of Bell thinking less of Bama and picking UT than there is of Green thinking less of the SEC and picking Michigan.

    smasher423

  • This is why I wanted Georgia to beat Alabama, so we could add to the growing number of SEC who have won the BCS.
    The SEC is truly a great conference and it will demonstrate it again in the bowl season, probably by winning most of its games in the 4th quarter.

    DaddyHink

  • Just thought of another question which relates very closely to this discussion topic:

    Would you rather UT be 10-2 in the 2nd or 3rd best conference or 5-7 in the best conference? If the top teams in the league take a hit and the conference quality overall suffers, UT has a better chance to compete with those top teams, but it doesn't come with the same prestige that it used to. What would you rather have?

    smasher423

  • smasher423 said...

    I would say if Bama loses, there is a better chance of Bell thinking less of Bama and picking UT than there is of Green thinking less of the SEC and picking Michigan.

    Exactly, because we go head to head with them, so we should hope they lose.

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • DaddyHink said...

    This is why I wanted Georgia to beat Alabama, so we could add to the growing number of SEC who have won the BCS. The SEC is truly a great conference and it will demonstrate it again in the bowl season, probably by winning most of its games in the 4th quarter.

    And that's okay with you, while UT sits at home for the second season in a row?

    Why does that make you feel better about our situation? I would prefer they all get beaten to death, which maybe makes them lose some recruits and opens the door for us to beat them in the next couple of years.

    How about that? I want to beat our competitors, not watch them win championships while our season is over and we got embarrassed yet again.

    I want to whip them, and no one has yet made a cogent argument as to how them winning helps us beat them. The only end that I care about is UT wins.

    This post was edited by Denver Vol on 12/20/2012 at 2:37 PM

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • Denver Vol said...

    And that's okay with you, while UT sits at home for the second season in a row?

    Why does that make you feel better about our situation? I would prefer they all get beaten to death, which maybe makes them lose some recruits and opens the door for us to beat them in the next couple of years.

    How about that? I want to beat our competitors, not watch them win championships while our season is over and we got embarrassed yet again.

    I want to whip them, and no one has yet made a cogent argument as to how them winning helps us beat them. The only end that I care about is UT wins.

    The SEC winning makes it more attractive for prospects not in the south to play in the south. We may not be able to steal 4 and 5 star kids from the states of Georgia and ALabama, but we may be able to in Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Maryland where Georgia and Alabama may not want to recruit as much...

    Does Bama winning it all help us w/ recruits in Alabama and Georgia? Not really, but Tennessee every year spends the most $ on recruiting. If we recruit talent outside of the SEC, the SEC winning 7 championships in a row is good bragging rights when we step into a propsects house in states not in the south.

    hdrizzle21

  • Denver Vol said...

    Name a recruit that came to UT because Alabama has been dominant.

    I think you will notice that I got a strong post going last night on this subject.

    However, I would like to respond directly to your postings on this subject. There are only two ways that your argument makes sense:
    1. Because Bama wins they get to sign as many players as they want.
    2. Because Bama wins there are only 25 good prospects available and the rest aren't worth having.

    There are 4 or 5 teams in this conference that have great recruiting pull because of a history of winning and geographical advantage. The SEC is a powerful pull for the rest of the programs to attract attention from national recruits. I would then argue that our heritage and the quality of our campus and infrastructure gives us a tremendous advantage over the remainder of the teams in the SEC. So yes, I do believe that there is value in other SEC teams in general and Bama specifically doing well against non-conference competition.

    SWVolfan

  • hdrizzle21 said...

    The SEC winning makes it more attractive for prospects not in the south to play in the south. We may not be able to steal 4 and 5 star kids from the states of Georgia and ALabama, but we may be able to in Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Maryland where Georgia and Alabama may not want to recruit as much...

    Does Bama winning it all help us w/ recruits in Alabama and Georgia? Not really, but Tennessee every year spends the most $ on recruiting. If we recruit talent outside of the SEC, the SEC winning 7 championships in a row is good bragging rights when we step into a propsects house in states not in the south.

    But where are those players? We aren't exactly stacking up on 4* and 5* players, unless they've been passed over by other SEC teams, and you can probably only name a handful of those. Wouldn't it be better to be able to go head-to-head with recruits the other SEC teams want and win?

    I've tried to logically spell out why SEC dominance doesn't help us, and you guys just keep asserting is does without adding any more color to your opinion.

    You can't just keep insisting that it helps us with no evidence or logic and expect me to eventually believe you.

    This post was edited by Denver Vol on 12/20/2012 at 2:48 PM

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • The SEC is the king and definitely helps all the teams in the league. Where do you find one loss SEC teams in the rankings? Ahead of all other one loss teams. Tennesee needs to win football games in order for the strength of schedule to help us. The lack of strength in the SEC may be revealed in the NCAA basketball field this year. It is best for all the teams in the conference to be in the strongest conference. We have not been able to enjoy these benefite because we have under achieved in our conference. Gooooo Bama.

    allvolrog

  • Denver Vol said...

    But where are those players? We aren't exactly stacking up on 4* and 5* players.

    I've tried to logically spell out why SEC dominance doesn't help us, and you guys just keep asserting is does without adding any more color to your opinion.

    You can't just keep insisting that it helps us with no evidence or logic and expect me to eventually believe you.

    That's Dooley's fault. We now have a Head coach with a pulse.

    This post was edited by hdrizzle21 on 12/20/2012 at 2:48 PM

    hdrizzle21

  • SWVolfan said...

    I think you will notice that I got a strong post going last night on this subject.

    However, I would like to respond directly to your postings on this subject. There are only two ways that your argument makes sense: 1. Because Bama wins they get to sign as many players as they want. 2. Because Bama wins there are only 25 good prospects available and the rest aren't worth having.

    There are 4 or 5 teams in this conference that have great recruiting pull because of a history of winning and geographical advantage. The SEC is a powerful pull for the rest of the programs to attract attention from national recruits. I would then argue that our heritage and the quality of our campus and infrastructure gives us a tremendous advantage over the remainder of the teams in the SEC. So yes, I do believe that there is value in other SEC teams in general and Bama specifically doing well against non-conference competition.

    Thanks for laying out a logical rationale and not just insisting again on the opinion.

    I think it may raise the profile of the conference, but my point is that we're in an era of ultra-performance from an unprecedented number of teams in this conference. Never before has Florida, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Miss. St., Texas A&M, etc. all been so good at once.

    Again, I don't want the league to go to crap, but as long as all of those teams continue pulverizing everyone, we get penalized and not helped for it.

    To prove your point, I need someone to show me very good to elite recruits that signed with Tennessee because other teams in the SEC have been very successful. It's the only way to prove the point, because I can sit here all day and show you example of recruits we have lost to other SEC teams because they have been very successful, therefore proving my point.

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • hdrizzle21 said...

    That's Dooley's fault. We now have a Head coach with a pulse.

    So, logically, regardless of who is the coach, we would have done worse in recruiting if Bama and Florida and Auburn hadn't been winning all of these championships? You don't think that maybe if they had lost a little bit more it would have opened the door for us to land some more recruits?

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • volfan28 said...

    Here's how I see it,

    The SEC has won 6 straight national championships. Tennessee is coming off back-to-back 5-7 seasons.

    It doesn't appear that SEC dominance is helping us a whole whole lot.

    The biggest things that have hurt TN were a bad hire with Kiffin in retrospect because of the one and done and the hiring of Coach Dooley. The program has also not had a lot of luck with injuries over the past few years as well. In the past TN has been pretty damn good while Florida and or Bama have been successful. Back then it was going back and forth on who was better between us and them. And we were included in that. Other SEC teams don't have to fall for us to be successful. A well coached and recruited program in conjunction with our heritage and infrastructure should bring us back to the top!

    SWVolfan

  • Also, thanks to everyone for having a good debate here. I like that we can all disagree without being jerks...it's the best thing about this site.

    These kinds of discussion are very fun for me, so thanks again.

    "People think I'm the greatest damn coach in the world, but Neyland taught me everything I know" -Bear Bryant

    Denver Vol

  • Wanting the SEC to beat non- SEC teams does not mean I'm content with Tennessee staying at home with a 5-7 record. Alabama is not going to be any less competitive next year if they lose to Notre Dame. If anything, it gives the best coach in college football more motivation the following year and a recruiting pitch to uber prospects that they are the missing link to winning the next championship.

    Rather, the dominance of the SEC forces the hands of all those associated with the program; AD, Chancellor, BoT, boosters, etc to committ to getting UT back on top. one example - We don't pull out all the stops in the new state- of- the- art training facility if we didn't feel the pressure to stay competitive. That facility is touted as being one of best in the nation - both college and the NFL- and definitely going to be a factor in recruiting.

    memphischic