-
SamVolsam
- 5 stars Rating: 96
1777 votes total - Special teams
- (3709)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
utkdominic
- 5 stars Rating: 96
500 votes total - Walk-on
- (829)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
bgosnell151
- 5 stars Rating: 96
578 votes total - Redshirt
- (1331)
- 6 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
bgosnell151
- 5 stars Rating: 96
578 votes total - Redshirt
- (1331)
- 6 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SamVolsam
- 5 stars Rating: 96
1777 votes total - Special teams
- (3709)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SamVolsam
- 5 stars Rating: 96
1777 votes total - Special teams
- (3709)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
coonhound ●
- 5 stars Rating: 81
629 votes total - Walk-on
- (712)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
allwillbeorange
- 5 stars Rating: 97
1823 votes total - Two-deep
- (4040)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
coonhound said...
what you are describing was caused almost completely by turnover of the coaching staff. Here again we have a coach, with no relationships with SEC caliber prospects and with only about 2 months to try to keep some of the commitments on the books and working hard to fill positions of need...in some cases now with bodies. It reminds me of Dooley's first recruiting class where he had just a few short weeks to work with. We signed some kids none of us had ever heard of that year. We may see similar this year.
This post was edited by SamVolsam on 1/9/2013 at 8:52 AM
SamVolsam
- 5 stars Rating: 96
1777 votes total - Special teams
- (3709)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Myrtlevol
- 5 stars Rating: 98
281 votes total - Walk-on
- (620)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SamVolsam said...
2.5 weeks is a lot worse than getting hired in Dec. and having a full week on the road in Dec. with assts with SEC/ south ties. No way if you hooked Dooley up to a lie detector would he pass the test by saying that 1st staff is the one he wanted to have if he was to go back to his hire date and give him more time to assemble it. Mid to late Jan and after NSD is an awful time to hire a staff.
I agree that 45+ coaches since the Fall of 2008 has led to our recruiting problem and records and image etc
I will disagree that attrition is bc of those coaches and changes in scheme. Most flat out washed out.
I will agree that in 2010 Dooley just had to take bodies and risks. I dont think Jones will have to risk as much with about 6 weeks to be on the road and a staff he had time to assemble and has SEC area ties. Plus this time we dont need bodies in most all areas minus OT (maybe)......we can and have time to recruit selected/ evaluated talent. JMO
bgosnell151
- 5 stars Rating: 96
578 votes total - Redshirt
- (1331)
- 6 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Seanbt ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
359 votes total - Walk-on
- (669)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
smasher423 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
1105 votes total - Redshirt
- (1417)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Myrtlevol said...
Sam, I have to ask this with the amount of great research you have put on this board. Do you have a job? Great work my man! Attrition not s bad as it has been. Love having the O-line we will have next year. Plug in Jackson for Thomas and I don't think we will miss a beat upfront. Thanks to Dooley for that.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by SamVolsam on 1/9/2013 at 10:42 AM
SamVolsam
- 5 stars Rating: 96
1777 votes total - Special teams
- (3709)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
smasher423 said...
Nice breakdown. That is interesting to see how we got where we are right now.
Can you do this for every other team in the SEC? Juuuuuust kidding, but I am curious how this compares to other teams. Everyone can expect some amount of attrition: players getting in trouble, transfers, etc. I think we can all tell from the naked eye that we have had more of this than most teams, but what is normal? What amount of attrition is ok and doesn't prevent success? What does a team like Georgia, LSU, S. Carolina, or Bama who have consistency in their coaching staff and good recruiting endure from an attrition standpoint. Surely they swing and miss on some of their top recruits, right?
SamVolsam
- 5 stars Rating: 96
1777 votes total - Special teams
- (3709)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of GoVols247 only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
volwr88 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
658 votes total - Redshirt
- (1048)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
volsr4me
- 5 stars Rating: 98
109 votes total - Blue chipper
- (428)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
UTs top signees of 2009-2012: Where are they and how did they do